The Spreadsheet Conundrum
Ken Pugh ken@kenpugh.com https://kenpugh.com
The spreadsheet is a simple analogy to allocate responsibilities for many organizational and design decisions you need to make. Responsibilities can be assigned by rows, by columns, or by some combination of the two. The spreadsheet conundrum gives you suggestions on how you can do that assignment.
For example, in an insurance company, there are different types of policies and different activities for each of the policies.
Type/Activity |
Sell Policy |
Renew Policy |
Pay Claim |
Audit Claims |
Farm |
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
The responsibilities could be assigned so that each activity for a policy type is performed by the same unit (individual, team, or larger). This is shown by the ovals on the row which encompass one unit’s responsibilities
Type/Activity |
Sell Policy |
Renew Policy |
Pay Claim |
Audit Claims |
Farm |
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, the responsibilities could be assigned so that for each activity the same unit is responsible for all types of policies. This is shown by the ovals on the columns which encompass one unit’s responsibilities:
Type/Activity |
Sell Policy |
Renew Policy |
Pay Claim |
Audit Claims |
Farm |
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
Note that one unit might be responsible for two or more of the activities. For example, Sell Policy and Renew Policy might be the responsibility of the same unit. This could be shown as:
Type/Activity |
Sell Policy |
Renew Policy |
Pay Claim |
Audit Claims |
Farm |
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
Another alternative is to assign units to most of the activities for a policy type and then one unit for one activity (e.g. Audit Claims) across all policies.
Type/Activity |
Sell Policy |
Renew Policy |
Pay Claim |
Audit Claims |
Farm |
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
|
|
In a software development, there are different products and different activities to provide each product. The activities for each product might be the responsibility of a single unit or multiple products might be shared by the same unit. In this case, the units represent complete cross-functional teams.
Activity/Product |
Product 1 |
Product 2 |
Product 3 |
User Interface |
|
|
|
Backend |
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
Testing |
|
|
|
User Experience |
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Data Analysis |
|
|
|
External Acquisitions |
|
|
|
One could assign responsibilities for each activity to a unit:
Activity/Product |
Product 1 |
Product 2 |
Product 3 |
User Interface |
|
|
|
Backend |
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
Testing |
|
|
|
User Experience |
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
fInfrastructure |
|
|
|
Data Analysis |
|
|
|
External Acquisitions |
|
|
|
Some of the activities for a product might be the responsibility of a unit. Other activities (e.g. infrastructure) are performed by unit for all projects. There are many possibilities in which responsibilities are arranged by product and activity. This is just one of them.
Activity/Product |
Product 1 |
Product 2 |
Product 3 |
User Interface |
|
|
|
Backend |
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
Testing |
|
|
|
User Experience |
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Data Analysis |
|
|
|
External Acquisitions |
|
|
|
For some activities, there could be two more units that provide that activity for different products. For example, two units might provide User Experience for different products:
Activity/Product |
Product 1 |
Product 2 |
Product 3 |
User Experience |
|
|
|
There are tradeoffs in how you assign the responsibilities. Your decisions are based on organizational and design principles, context, the group structure, the complexity of the responsibilities, commonality, and so forth. The spreadsheet gives a simple diagram to discuss the potential groupings and tradeoffs.
You might try creating a spreadsheet for your current allocation of responsibilities to see how they line up.